When it comes to making an impact on social determinants of health, the biggest barrier healthcare providers and payers face is funding these initiatives and getting paid for their efforts, according to a survey by Modern Healthcare Custom Media.
Fifty-five percent of payers and providers cited budgetary constraints/lack of reimbursement as their top challenge in addressing social determinants of health. Difficulty in proving return on investment ranked second among the 600 payers and providers who responded to the survey, conducted on behalf of Envolve Health.
Meanwhile, the stakes in managing complex medical conditions are high, payers and providers agree. Fifty percent of respondents believe social determinants of health have a significant impact on chronic disease management.
“These are not small needs,” says Rashi Venkataraman, executive director of prevention and population health, America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP). “Social determinants of health point to bigger-picture gaps in resources that significantly affect population health. And there is no one-size-fits-all approach.”
The survey results point to the need for close collaboration between payers and providers in determining the right strategies to assess social determinants of health investment initiatives.
Just 41 percent of survey respondents say their organizations are adequately addressing social determinants of health for the populations they serve. Resource constraints—both for payers and providers—continue to be a significant challenge, Venkataraman says.
“Everyone is mindful of resource limitations,” she says. “That’s why organizations are taking their time to develop their social determinants of health strategies: They want to establish initiatives that are sustainable and will have a demonstrative, long-term impact.”
And while both payers and providers recognize the potential for investments in social determinants of health to improve outcomes and reduce costs, substantial funding by either of these entities remains rare, recent research by George Mason University and Harvard Business School shows.
Absence of financial buy-in from state governments also is a key barrier, says Francis Rienzo, interim CEO for Medicaid Health Plans of America (MHPA). “States often have a hard time seeing the value of aligning investments in social determinants with healthcare programs,” Rienzo says.
“For example, we know that having care managers in home settings delivers far more value than it costs, because these individuals are able to see firsthand whether a member has food in his refrigerator or whether an aging member has tripping hazards in the home that could lead to a hospital stay. The interventions made by these care managers help to avoid cost, but across budget silos. But the state ends up paying the bill for these resources—and that can be a hard sell. Because of the funding silos for support services like food, housing and others, it becomes very challenging for state health plans to offer new, innovative programs that may cost more on the administrative side before they result in cost reduction on the medical health side.”
Meanwhile, some health plans and providers are hesitant to deploy creative approaches given the shortage of resources and insufficient data around interventions that work. “This is a new space, and it’s an art,” Rienzo says.
How can payers and providers build strong partnerships to effectively address social determinants of health? There are four strategies to consider.